You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The oxidative potential of differently charged silver and gold nanoparticles on three human lung epithelial cell types
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-014-0062-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Schlinkert, Eudald Casals, Matthew Boyles, Ulrike Tischler, Eva Hornig, Ngoc Tran, Jiayuan Zhao, Martin Himly, Michael Riediker, Gertie Janneke Oostingh, Victor Puntes, Albert Duschl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 19% |
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 18 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 36 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,337,210
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#1,228
of 1,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,135
of 352,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,424 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.