↓ Skip to main content

Make it SIMPLE: enhanced shock management by focused cardiac ultrasound

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intensive Care, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 544)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
66 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Make it SIMPLE: enhanced shock management by focused cardiac ultrasound
Published in
Journal of Intensive Care, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40560-016-0176-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ka Leung Mok

Abstract

Shock is a spectrum of circulatory failure that, if not properly managed, would lead to high mortality. Special diagnostic and treatment strategies are essential to save lives. However, clinical and laboratory findings are always non-specific, resulting in clinical dilemmas. Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) has emerged as one of the power tools for clinicians to answer simple clinical questions and guide subsequent management in hypotensive patients. This article will review the development and utility of FoCUS in different types of shock. The sonographic features and ultrasound enhanced management of hypotensive patients by a de novo "SIMPLE" approach will be described. Current evidence on FoCUS will also be reviewed. Focused cardiac ultrasound provides timely and valuable information for the evaluation of shock. It helps to improve the diagnostic accuracy, narrow the possible differential diagnoses, and guide specific management. SIMPLE is an easy-to-remember mnemonic for non-cardiologists or novice clinical sonographers to apply FoCUS and interpret the specific sonographic findings when evaluating patients in shock.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 159 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 29 18%
Student > Master 18 11%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 9%
Other 38 24%
Unknown 29 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 65%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 36 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2021.
All research outputs
#949,435
of 24,115,737 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#36
of 544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,605
of 349,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,115,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.