↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial diversity analysis of larvae and adult midgut microflora using culture-dependent and culture-independent methods in lab-reared and field-collected Anopheles stephensi-an Asian malarial…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
259 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bacterial diversity analysis of larvae and adult midgut microflora using culture-dependent and culture-independent methods in lab-reared and field-collected Anopheles stephensi-an Asian malarial vector
Published in
BMC Microbiology, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-9-96
Pubmed ID
Authors

Asha Rani, Anil Sharma, Raman Rajagopal, Tridibesh Adak, Raj K Bhatnagar

Abstract

Mosquitoes are intermediate hosts for numerous disease causing organisms. Vector control is one of the most investigated strategy for the suppression of mosquito-borne diseases. Anopheles stephensi is one of the vectors of malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax. The parasite undergoes major developmental and maturation steps within the mosquito midgut and little is known about Anopheles-associated midgut microbiota. Identification and characterization of the mosquito midgut flora is likely to contribute towards better understanding of mosquito biology including longevity, reproduction and mosquito-pathogen interactions that are important to evolve strategies for vector control mechanisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 297 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 24%
Researcher 49 16%
Student > Master 45 14%
Student > Bachelor 37 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 59 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 153 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 2%
Environmental Science 7 2%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 64 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,209,584
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#454
of 3,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,585
of 97,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.