↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of culture-negative and culture-positive sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of culture-negative and culture-positive sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Critical Care, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13054-021-03592-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuting Li, Jianxing Guo, Hongmei Yang, Hongxiang Li, Yangyang Shen, Dong Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 8%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 45 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 30%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 46 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,993,541
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,768
of 6,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,811
of 456,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#41
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.