You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of culture-negative and culture-positive sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, May 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03592-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuting Li, Jianxing Guo, Hongmei Yang, Hongxiang Li, Yangyang Shen, Dong Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 4 | 10% |
Colombia | 3 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
Mexico | 2 | 5% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Guatemala | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 20 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 29 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 18% |
Scientists | 3 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
Researcher | 6 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 15% |
Unknown | 45 | 52% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 30% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 46 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,993,541
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,768
of 6,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,811
of 456,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#41
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.