You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigation of clinically acceptable agreement between two methods of automatic measurement of limb occlusion pressure: a randomised trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Biomedical Engineering, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42490-021-00053-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luke Hughes, James McEwen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,281,451
of 25,337,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biomedical Engineering
#11
of 39 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,817
of 436,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biomedical Engineering
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,337,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one scored the same or higher as 28 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.