You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Variation in hypertension clinical practice guidelines: a global comparison
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-021-01963-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richu Philip, Thomas Beaney, Nick Appelbaum, Carmen Rodriguez Gonzalvez, Charlotte Koldeweij, Amelia Kataria Golestaneh, Neil Poulter, Jonathan M. Clarke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 41% |
| Japan | 2 | 7% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 33% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 41 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,243,529
of 25,056,530 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,515
of 3,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,401
of 434,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#31
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,056,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.