↓ Skip to main content

Disability and schizophrenia: a systematic review of experienced psychosocial difficulties

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Disability and schizophrenia: a systematic review of experienced psychosocial difficulties
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-12-193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Piotr Świtaj, Marta Anczewska, Anna Chrostek, Carla Sabariego, Alarcos Cieza, Jerome Bickenbach, Somnath Chatterji

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a significantly disabling disease that affects all major areas of life. There is a lack of comprehensive synthesis of research findings on the full extent of psychosocial difficulties (PSDs) experienced by people living with schizophrenia. This paper provides a systematic review of the literature concerning PSDs and their associated factors in schizophrenia. PSDs were conceptualized in accordance with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as disabilities, in particular impairments of mental functions, activity limitations and participation restrictions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 237 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 13%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Bachelor 30 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 45 19%
Unknown 43 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 70 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 61 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 7%
Social Sciences 14 6%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 56 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2012.
All research outputs
#5,415,901
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,153
of 5,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,210
of 197,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#22
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.