↓ Skip to main content

The match between institutional elderly care management research and management challenges - a systematic literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The match between institutional elderly care management research and management challenges - a systematic literature review
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-10-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaija Kokkonen, Sari Rissanen, Anneli Hujala

Abstract

Elderly care practice and its management together with policy and research play a crucial role in responding to increasing challenges in institutional care for elderly people. Successful dialogue between these is necessary. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to compare how institutional elderly care management research meets the care challenges currently emphasized in international long-term care policy documents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 18 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Social Sciences 15 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2012.
All research outputs
#15,256,044
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#1,076
of 1,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,473
of 183,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.