You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mesenchymal stem cells in tissue repairing and regeneration: Progress and future
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Burns & Trauma, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.4103/2321-3868.113330 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiafei Xi, Xinlong Yan, Junnian Zhou, Wen Yue, Xuetao Pei |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Burns & Trauma
#91
of 304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,424
of 209,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Burns & Trauma
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.