↓ Skip to main content

Levosimendan and mortality after coronary revascularisation: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Levosimendan and mortality after coronary revascularisation: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published in
Critical Care, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ritesh Maharaj, Victoria Metaxa

Abstract

Patients undergoing coronary revascularization often require inotropic support that has been associated with an increased risk for death and morbidity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of levosimendan versus control on survival after coronary revascularization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
France 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Philippines 1 1%
Unknown 65 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 22%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 70%
Unspecified 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 13 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,740,207
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,131
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,634
of 124,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#32
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.