You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical comparison of sub-mm high-resolution non-contrast coronary CMR angiography against coronary CT angiography in patients with low-intermediate risk of coronary artery disease: a single center trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-021-00758-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Reza Hajhosseiny, Imran Rashid, Aurélien Bustin, Camila Munoz, Gastao Cruz, Muhummad Sohaib Nazir, Karine Grigoryan, Tevfik F. Ismail, Rebecca Preston, Radhouene Neji, Karl Kunze, Reza Razavi, Amedeo Chiribiri, Pier Giorgio Masci, Ronak Rajani, Claudia Prieto, René M. Botnar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Jordan | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 17% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,928,646
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#64
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,002
of 457,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#2
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.