↓ Skip to main content

Methodology of the DCCSS later fatigue study: a model to investigate chronic fatigue in long-term survivors of childhood cancer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methodology of the DCCSS later fatigue study: a model to investigate chronic fatigue in long-term survivors of childhood cancer
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12874-021-01298-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adriaan Penson, Sylvia van Deuren, Ewald Bronkhorst, Ellen Keizer, Tom Heskes, Marieke J. H. Coenen, Judith G. M. Rosmalen, Wim J. E. Tissing, Helena J. H. van der Pal, Andrica C. H. de Vries, Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Sebastian Neggers, Birgitta A. B. Versluys, Marloes Louwerens, Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo, Saskia M. F. Pluijm, Martha Grootenhuis, Nicole Blijlevens, Leontien C. M. Kremer, Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, Hans Knoop, Jacqueline Loonen

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 11%
Unspecified 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 24 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Unspecified 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 23 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,895,945
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#837
of 2,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,118
of 442,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#31
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.