You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Oxygen/ozone as a medical gas mixture. A critical evaluation of the various methods clarifies positive and negative aspects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Gas Research, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2045-9912-1-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Velio Bocci, Iacopo Zanardi, Valter Travagli |
| Abstract |
Besides oxygen, several other gases such as NO, CO, H2, H2S, Xe and O3 have come to age over the past few years. With regards to O3, its mechanisms of action in medicine have been clarified during the last two decades so that now a comprehensive framework for understanding and recommending ozone therapy in various pathologies is available. O3 used within the determined therapeutic window is absolutely safe and more effective than golden standard medications in numerous pathologies, like vascular diseases. However, ozone therapy is mostly in practitioners' hands and some recent developments for increasing cost effectiveness and speed of treatment are neither standardized, nor evaluated toxicologically. Hence, the aim of this article is to emphasize the need to objectively assess the pros and cons of oxygen/ozone as a medical gas mixture in the hope that ozone therapy will be accepted by orthodox medicine in the near future. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 427 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 103 | 24% |
| Korea, Republic of | 3 | <1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| Bhutan | 1 | <1% |
| Curaçao | 1 | <1% |
| Nepal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 306 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 425 | 100% |
| Scientists | 1 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 135 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 15% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 41 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 24% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 10 | 7% |
| Engineering | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 20% |
| Unknown | 46 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 182. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2024.
All research outputs
#224,676
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Medical Gas Research
#5
of 357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#693
of 122,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Gas Research
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them