↓ Skip to main content

Field site selection: getting it right first time around

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Field site selection: getting it right first time around
Published in
Malaria Journal, November 2009
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-8-s2-s9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin A Malcolm, Badria El Sayed, Ahmed Babiker, Romain Girod, Didier Fontenille, Bart GJ Knols, Abdel Hameed Nugud, Mark Q Benedict

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Senegal 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Madagascar 1 <1%
Unknown 105 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Master 11 10%
Other 7 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 36%
Environmental Science 13 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 20 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,499
of 5,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,859
of 80,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#21
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.