↓ Skip to main content

Letter to the Editor: Cancer rates not explained by smoking: how to investigate a single county

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Letter to the Editor: Cancer rates not explained by smoking: how to investigate a single county
Published in
Environmental Health, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12940-021-00737-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas J. Myers, Polly Hoppin, Molly Jacobs, Richard Clapp, David Kriebel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 40%
Unknown 3 60%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2021.
All research outputs
#18,904,441
of 21,260,632 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#1,288
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,537
of 349,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,260,632 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them