You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells derived extracellular vesicles can safely ameliorate the progression of chronic kidney diseases
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biomaterials Research, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40824-016-0068-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wael Nassar, Mervat El-Ansary, Dina Sabry, Mostafa A. Mostafa, Tarek Fayad, Esam Kotb, Mahmoud Temraz, Abdel-Naser Saad, Wael Essa, Heba Adel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 13% |
Egypt | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 247 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 17% |
Student > Master | 37 | 15% |
Researcher | 25 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 4% |
Other | 32 | 13% |
Unknown | 88 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 57 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 4% |
Other | 20 | 8% |
Unknown | 101 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,833,683
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biomaterials Research
#9
of 203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,623
of 388,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomaterials Research
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them