The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
72 revision surgeries for aseptic failure after hip or knee arthroplasty: a prospective study with an extended diagnostic algorithm
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12891-019-2944-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vesal Khalid, Henrik Carl Schønheyder, Poul Torben Nielsen, Andreas Kappel, Trine Rolighed Thomsen, Ramune Aleksyniene, Jan Lorenzen, Sten Rasmussen |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 14% |
Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 20% |
Unknown | 13 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 41% |
Engineering | 3 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 17 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,291,488
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#848
of 4,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,712
of 460,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#25
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.