You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Methods of sample size calculation in descriptive retrospective burden of illness studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-018-0657-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karissa M. Johnston, Pardis Lakzadeh, Bonnie M. K. Donato, Shelagh M. Szabo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 225 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 15% |
| Researcher | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 17% |
| Unknown | 74 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 43 | 19% |
| Unknown | 84 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2021.
All research outputs
#6,353,982
of 23,507,405 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#953
of 2,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,679
of 440,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#42
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,507,405 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.