You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implications of early respiratory support strategies on disease progression in critical COVID-19: a matched subanalysis of the prospective RISC-19-ICU cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03580-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pedro D. Wendel Garcia, Hernán Aguirre-Bermeo, Philipp K. Buehler, Mario Alfaro-Farias, Bernd Yuen, Sascha David, Thomas Tschoellitsch, Tobias Wengenmayer, Anita Korsos, Alberto Fogagnolo, Gian-Reto Kleger, Maddalena A. Wu, Riccardo Colombo, Fabrizio Turrini, Antonella Potalivo, Emanuele Rezoagli, Raquel Rodríguez-García, Pedro Castro, Arantxa Lander-Azcona, Maria C. Martín-Delgado, Herminia Lozano-Gómez, Rolf Ensner, Marc P. Michot, Nadine Gehring, Peter Schott, Martin Siegemund, Lukas Merki, Jan Wiegand, Marie M. Jeitziner, Marcus Laube, Petra Salomon, Frank Hillgaertner, Alexander Dullenkopf, Hatem Ksouri, Sara Cereghetti, Serge Grazioli, Christian Bürkle, Julien Marrel, Isabelle Fleisch, Marie-Helene Perez, Anja Baltussen Weber, Samuele Ceruti, Katharina Marquardt, Tobias Hübner, Hermann Redecker, Michael Studhalter, Michael Stephan, Daniela Selz, Urs Pietsch, Anette Ristic, Antje Heise, Friederike Meyer zu Bentrup, Marilene Franchitti Laurent, Patricia Fodor, Tomislav Gaspert, Christoph Haberthuer, Elif Colak, Dorothea M. Heuberger, Thierry Fumeaux, Jonathan Montomoli, Philippe Guerci, Reto A. Schuepbach, Matthias P. Hilty, Ferran Roche-Campo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Andorra | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Russia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 21% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 47 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 52 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,287,736
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,013
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,788
of 459,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#45
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.