You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
3D whole-heart grey-blood late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, May 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-021-00751-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Giorgia Milotta, Camila Munoz, Karl P. Kunze, Radhouene Neji, Stefano Figliozzi, Amedeo Chiribiri, Reza Hajhosseiny, Pier Giorgio Masci, Claudia Prieto, René M. Botnar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 33% |
Chile | 1 | 8% |
Russia | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 22% |
Professor | 3 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 26% |
Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 22% |
Computer Science | 3 | 13% |
Engineering | 3 | 13% |
Mathematics | 2 | 9% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,451,960
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#275
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,246
of 461,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#8
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.