You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing traditional, immersive simulation with Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice in postgraduate year 2 anesthesiology residents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Simulation, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41077-021-00174-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erin E. Blanchard, Lee Ann Riesenberg, Lisa B. Bergman, Michelle R. Brown, Emma C. O’Hagan, Shivani J. Patel, Tekuila R. Carter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 24% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 12% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 18% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 24% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,872,650
of 23,622,736 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#128
of 245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,530
of 450,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,622,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.