You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reproductive health decision making among nomadic pastoralists in North Eastern Kenya: a qualitative social network analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12978-021-01164-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leah Kenny, Rahma Hassan, Loraine J. Bacchus, Matthew Smith, Bettina Shell-Duncan, Nana Apenem Dagadu, Angela Muriuki, Abdullahi Hussein Aden, Ibrahim Abdirizak Jelle, Beniamino Cislaghi, Mazeda Hossain |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 57% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Kenya | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 64% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,885,898
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#314
of 1,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,871
of 448,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#9
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.