↓ Skip to main content

Exertional dyspnea as initial manifestation of Takayasu's arteritis – A case report and literature review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exertional dyspnea as initial manifestation of Takayasu's arteritis – A case report and literature review
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, December 2001
DOI 10.1186/1471-2466-1-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beatrice Neidhart, Robert Kosek, Lucas M Bachmann, Claudia Stey

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 47%
Chemistry 1 6%
Unknown 8 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,657,585
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#616
of 1,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,154
of 124,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them