↓ Skip to main content

How to be an attractive male: floral dimorphism and attractiveness to pollinators in a dioecious plant

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to be an attractive male: floral dimorphism and attractiveness to pollinators in a dioecious plant
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-9-190
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc O Waelti, Paul A Page, Alex Widmer, Florian P Schiestl

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Costa Rica 2 2%
France 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
China 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 90 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 66%
Environmental Science 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 15 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,597,909
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,482
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,640
of 123,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#14
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.