You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Comparison of three different methods for risk adjustment in neonatal medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12887-017-0861-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Adams, Julia Braun, Hans Ulrich Bucher, Milo Alan Puhan, Dirk Bassler, Viktor Von Wyl, The Swiss Neonatal Network |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 33% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |