You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prognostic and predictive value of circulating tumor cell analysis in colorectal cancer patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-10-222 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andreia de Albuquerque, Ilja Kubisch, Ulrich Stölzel, Dominikus Ernst, Joachim Boese-Landgraf, Georg Breier, Gudrun Stamminger, Nikos Fersis, Sepp Kaul |
Abstract |
The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic and predictive values of circulating tumor cell (CTC) analysis in colorectal cancer patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Peru | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 50 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 19% |
Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Other | 9 | 17% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 42% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 17% |
Engineering | 5 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2012.
All research outputs
#13,371,661
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,575
of 3,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,216
of 179,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#27
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.