↓ Skip to main content

Video-assisted thoracoscopic left lower lobectomy in a patient with lung cancer and a right aortic arch

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Video-assisted thoracoscopic left lower lobectomy in a patient with lung cancer and a right aortic arch
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1749-8090-7-120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hideyuki Wada, Yasuhiro Hida, Kichizo Kaga, Ryunosuke Hase, Kazuto Ohtaka, Jun Muto, Reiko Nakada-Kubota, Satoshi Hirano, Yoshiro Matsui

Abstract

A right aortic arch is a rare congenital anomaly, with a reported incidence of around 0.1%. A patient with a right aortic arch underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery left lower lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection for squamous cell carcinoma. There was no aortic arch or descending aorta in the left thoracic cavity, but the esophagus. There was no anomaly in the location or branching of the pulmonary vessels, the bronchi, and the lobulation of the lungs. The vagus nerve was found at the level of the left pulmonary artery. The arterial ligament was found between the left subclavian artery and the left pulmonary artery. The recurrent laryngeal nerve was recurrent around the left subclavian artery. A Kommerell diverticulum was found at the origin of the left subclavian artery. The patient experienced no complications. We conclude that video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy with mediastinal dissection is feasible for treating lung cancer with a right aortic arch.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 43%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 71%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2017.
All research outputs
#6,917,125
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#119
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,828
of 179,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them