You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Two different hematocrit detection methods: Different methods, different results?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-3-65 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marco Bosshart, John F Stover, Reto Stocker, Lars M Asmis, Jörg Feige, Thomas A Neff, Reto A Schuepbach, Silvia R Cottini, Markus Béchir |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 26% |
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Professor | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 52% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |