↓ Skip to main content

Clinical procedure for colon carcinoma tissue sampling directly affects the cancer marker-capacity of VEGF family members

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical procedure for colon carcinoma tissue sampling directly affects the cancer marker-capacity of VEGF family members
Published in
BMC Cancer, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-12-515
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Pringels, Nancy Van Damme, Bram De Craene, Piet Pattyn, Wim Ceelen, Marc Peeters, Johan Grooten

Abstract

mRNA levels of members of the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor family (VEGF-A, -B, -C, -D, Placental Growth Factor/PlGF) have been investigated as tissue-based markers of colon cancer. These studies, which used specimens obtained by surgical resection or colonoscopic biopsy, yielded contradictory results. We studied the effect of the sampling method on the marker accuracy of VEGF family members.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2012.
All research outputs
#17,670,751
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,956
of 8,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,873
of 179,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#74
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,249 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.