↓ Skip to main content

Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with upper limb functional training in children with spastic, hemiparetic cerebral palsy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with upper limb functional training in children with spastic, hemiparetic cerebral palsy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1534-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renata Calhes Franco Moura, Cibele Almeida Santos, Luanda André Collange Grecco, Roberta Delasta Lazzari, Arislander Jonathan Lopes Dumont, Natalia Carvalho de Almeida Duarte, Luiz Alfredo Braun, Jamile Benite Palma Lopes, Ligia Abram dos Santos, Eliane Lopes Souza Rodrigues, Giorgio Albertini, Veronica Cimolin, Manuela Galli, Claudia Santos Oliveira

Abstract

The aim of the proposed study is to perform a comparative analysis of functional training effects for the paretic upper limb with and without transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex in children with spastic hemiparetic cerebral palsy. The sample will comprise 34 individuals with spastic hemiparetic cerebral palsy, 6 to 16 years old, classified at level I, II, or III of the Manual Ability Classification System. Participants will be randomly allocated to two groups: (1) functional training of the paretic upper limb combined with anodic transcranial stimulation; (2) functional training of the paretic upper limb combined with sham transcranial stimulation. Evaluation will involve three-dimensional movement analysis and electromyography using the SMART-D 140® system (BTS Engineering) and the FREEEMG® system (BTS Engineering), the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test, to assess functional mobility, the Portable Device and Ashworth Scale, to measure movement resistance and spasticity, and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, to evaluate performance. Functional reach training of the paretic upper limb will include a range of manual activities using educational toys associated with an induced constraint of the non-paretic limb during the training. Training will be performed in five weekly 20-minute sessions for two weeks. Transcranial stimulation over the primary motor cortex will be performed during the training sessions at an intensity of 1 mA. Findings will be analyzed statistically considering a 5 % significance level (P ≤ 0.05). This paper presents a detailed description of a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial designed to demonstrate the effects of combining transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex and functional training of the paretic limb in children with cerebral palsy classified at level I, II, or III of the Manual Ability Classification System. The results will be published and evidence found may contribute to the use of transcranial stimulation for this population. ReBEC RBR-6V4Y3K . Registered on 11 February 2015.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 234 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 15%
Student > Bachelor 31 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Researcher 13 6%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 85 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 49 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 13%
Neuroscience 14 6%
Sports and Recreations 12 5%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 99 42%