You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nasopharyngeal Microbiota in SARS-CoV-2 Positive and Negative Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Procedures Online, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12575-021-00148-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Phillip A. Engen, Ankur Naqib, Cheryl Jennings, Stefan J. Green, Alan Landay, Ali Keshavarzian, Robin M. Voigt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,494,134
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Biological Procedures Online
#10
of 183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,823
of 439,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Procedures Online
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them