↓ Skip to main content

Testing the proportional hazards assumption in cox regression and dealing with possible non-proportionality in total joint arthroplasty research: methodological perspectives and review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Testing the proportional hazards assumption in cox regression and dealing with possible non-proportionality in total joint arthroplasty research: methodological perspectives and review
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12891-021-04379-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilari Kuitunen, Ville T. Ponkilainen, Mikko M. Uimonen, Antti Eskelinen, Aleksi Reito

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Master 14 11%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 55 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 11%
Mathematics 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 27 22%
Unknown 61 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,535,671
of 24,363,506 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,201
of 4,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,568
of 437,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#25
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,363,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.