↓ Skip to main content

Social sciences research in neglected tropical diseases 1: the ongoing neglect in the neglected tropical diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social sciences research in neglected tropical diseases 1: the ongoing neglect in the neglected tropical diseases
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-8-32
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascale Allotey, Daniel D Reidpath, Subhash Pokhrel

Abstract

Centuries of scientific advances and developments in biomedical sciences have brought us a long way to understanding and managing disease processes, by reducing them to simplified cause-effect models. For most of the infectious diseases known today, we have the methods and technology to identify the causative agent, understand the mechanism by which pathology is induced and develop the treatment (drugs, vaccines, medical or surgical procedures) to cure, manage or control.Disease, however, occurs within a context of lives fraught with complexity. For any given infectious disease, who gets it, when, why, the duration, the severity, the outcome, the sequelae, are bound by a complex interplay of factors related as much to the individual as it is to the physical, social, cultural, political and economic environments. Furthermore each of these factors is in a dynamic state of change, evolving over time as they interact with each other. Simple solutions to infectious diseases are therefore rarely sustainable solutions. Sustainability would require the development of interdisciplinary sciences that allow us to acknowledge, understand and address these complexities as they occur, rather than rely solely on a form of science based on reducing the management of disease to simple paradigms.In this review we examine the current global health responses to the 'neglected' tropical diseases, which have been prioritised on the basis of an acknowledgment of the complexity of the poverty-disease cycle. However research and interventions for neglected tropical diseases, largely neglect the social and ecological contextual, factors that make these diseases persist in the target populations, continuing instead to focus on the simple biomedical interventions. We highlight the gaps in the approaches and explore the potential of enhanced interdisciplinary work in the development of long term solutions to disease control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 3%
United Kingdom 5 3%
United States 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 183 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 15%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Professor 8 4%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 35 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 46 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 36 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2016.
All research outputs
#6,383,652
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#756
of 1,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,899
of 99,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.