You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why and how to open intensive care units to family visits during the pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03608-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giovanni Mistraletti, Alberto Giannini, Giuseppe Gristina, Paolo Malacarne, Davide Mazzon, Elisabetta Cerutti, Alessandro Galazzi, Ilaria Giubbilo, Marco Vergano, Vladimiro Zagrebelsky, Luigi Riccioni, Giacomo Grasselli, Silvia Scelsi, Maurizio Cecconi, Flavia Petrini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 282 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 49 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 6% |
| United States | 14 | 5% |
| Italy | 12 | 4% |
| Argentina | 12 | 4% |
| Australia | 6 | 2% |
| Colombia | 6 | 2% |
| Mexico | 6 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 14% |
| Unknown | 116 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 215 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 33 | 12% |
| Scientists | 27 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 19% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 179. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2022.
All research outputs
#230,590
of 25,839,971 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#100
of 6,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,659
of 462,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#3
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,839,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.