↓ Skip to main content

Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12871-016-0229-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siriporn Pitimana-aree, Suthipol Udompanthurak, Saowaphak Lapmahapaisan, Matula Tareerath, Aungsumat Wangdee

Abstract

The quality of patients' recovery following surgery and anesthesia has been a matter of focus and concern over the past decade. The Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire was developed and validated for post-anesthesia patient evaluation. The QoR-40, however, is English-based and was tested and validated in Caucasian patients, a population that is culturally and behaviorally different from the Thai population. The objective of this study was to translate and modify the original English-language QoR-40 into the Thai language and evaluate the Quality of Recovery-35 Thai version for measuring health outcomes in Thai patients after surgery and anesthesia. Translation was performed according to internationally recognized translation standards to ensure the integrity of the translated version. Consistent with the recommendations of 25 anesthesiologists, five questions from the original QoR-40 were excluded. The 35-item questionnaire was then translated into the Thai language and renamed the Quality of Recovery-35 Thai version (Thai QoR-35). Overall, 43 outpatients and 53 inpatients rated their health and recovery status using three patient evaluation tools: 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale-Recovery (VAS-R), six-item Activities of Daily Living (ADL) questionnaire, and Thai QoR-35. Overall, 90 % of patients took <10 min to complete the Thai QoR-35 questionnaire. The Thai QoR-35 and VAS-R showed good convergent validity (r = 0.84, P < 0.001). Discrimination validity was supported by a significant difference in mean scores for recovery among the Thai QoR-35, VAS-R, and ADL when compared between outpatients and inpatients (P < 0.01) and also between baseline and postoperative values (P < 0.001). The Thai QoR-35 also demonstrated good reliability with high internal consistency at three time points (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88, 0.89, 0.91, respectively; P < 0.01) and a split-half reliability coefficient of 0.65 (P < 0.001). Thai QoR-35 is a valid, reliable tool for evaluating quality of recovery in Thai patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Master 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 8 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 38%