You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The respiratory control mechanisms in the brainstem and spinal cord: integrative views of the neuroanatomy and neurophysiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Physiological Sciences, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12576-016-0475-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Keiko Ikeda, Kiyoshi Kawakami, Hiroshi Onimaru, Yasumasa Okada, Shigefumi Yokota, Naohiro Koshiya, Yoshitaka Oku, Makito Iizuka, Hidehiko Koizumi |
| Abstract |
Respiratory activities are produced by medullary respiratory rhythm generators and are modulated from various sites in the lower brainstem, and which are then output as motor activities through premotor efferent networks in the brainstem and spinal cord. Over the past few decades, new knowledge has been accumulated on the anatomical and physiological mechanisms underlying the generation and regulation of respiratory rhythm. In this review, we focus on the recent findings and attempt to elucidate the anatomical and functional mechanisms underlying respiratory control in the lower brainstem and spinal cord. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Japan | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 276 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 8% |
| Researcher | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 15% |
| Unknown | 100 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 43 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 12% |
| Unknown | 112 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,797,157
of 25,815,269 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#39
of 493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,111
of 355,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,815,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.