↓ Skip to main content

Qualitative and quantitative comparison of cell-free DNA and cell-free fetal DNA isolation by four (semi-)automated extraction methods: impact in two clinical applications: chimerism quantification…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Qualitative and quantitative comparison of cell-free DNA and cell-free fetal DNA isolation by four (semi-)automated extraction methods: impact in two clinical applications: chimerism quantification and noninvasive prenatal diagnosis
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12967-020-02671-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascal Pedini, Hajer Graiet, Laurine Laget, Lugdivine Filosa, Jade Chatron, Nicem Cherouat, Jacques Chiaroni, Lucas Hubert, Coralie Frassati, Christophe Picard

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 13 25%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 16 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 13 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 18 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2021.
All research outputs
#18,991,176
of 21,346,377 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3,198
of 3,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,141
of 347,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,346,377 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them