↓ Skip to main content

Qualitative and quantitative comparison of cell-free DNA and cell-free fetal DNA isolation by four (semi-)automated extraction methods: impact in two clinical applications: chimerism quantification…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Qualitative and quantitative comparison of cell-free DNA and cell-free fetal DNA isolation by four (semi-)automated extraction methods: impact in two clinical applications: chimerism quantification and noninvasive prenatal diagnosis
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12967-020-02671-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascal Pedini, Hajer Graiet, Laurine Laget, Lugdivine Filosa, Jade Chatron, Nicem Cherouat, Jacques Chiaroni, Lucas Hubert, Coralie Frassati, Christophe Picard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Unspecified 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 28 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Unspecified 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 30 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2021.
All research outputs
#20,707,815
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3,408
of 4,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#429,564
of 503,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#81
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.