You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Patients who do not fulfill criteria for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy but have unexplained giant T-wave inversion: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance mid-term follow-up study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-020-00700-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shuang Li, Jian He, Jing Xu, Baiyan Zhuang, Bailing Wu, Bingqi Wei, Jinghan Huang, Gang Yin, Xiuyu Chen, Zhenhui Zhu, Hao Wang, Shihua Zhao, Minjie Lu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 21% |
India | 1 | 7% |
Russia | 1 | 7% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 7% |
China | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 29% |
Other | 2 | 29% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
Researcher | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 57% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,608,643
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#278
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,165
of 461,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.