You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficiency, error and yield in light-directed maskless synthesis of DNA microarrays
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-3155-9-57 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christy Agbavwe, Changhan Kim, DongGee Hong, Kurt Heinrich, Tao Wang, Mark M Somoza |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 26% |
| Chemistry | 19 | 24% |
| Engineering | 10 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,054,522
of 23,989,432 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#174
of 1,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,902
of 247,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,989,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.