You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A dual cardiomyocyte reporter model derived from human pluripotent stem cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, May 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13287-021-02341-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuqian Jiang, Xiaoping Bao, Xiaojun Lance Lian |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 42% |
Researcher | 3 | 25% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 17% |
Chemistry | 1 | 8% |
Engineering | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,255,482
of 24,727,020 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#870
of 2,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,338
of 439,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#23
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,727,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.