↓ Skip to main content

The clinical relevance of luteal phase progesterone support in true natural cycle cryopreserved blastocyst stage embryo transfers: a retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Fertility Research and Practice, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The clinical relevance of luteal phase progesterone support in true natural cycle cryopreserved blastocyst stage embryo transfers: a retrospective cohort study
Published in
Fertility Research and Practice, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40738-021-00096-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian N. Waldman, Catherine Racowsky, Emily R. Disler, Ann Thomas, Andrea Lanes, Mark D. Hornstein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 27%
Unspecified 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 45%
Unspecified 1 9%
Computer Science 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2022.
All research outputs
#18,618,203
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Fertility Research and Practice
#35
of 48 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#382,778
of 510,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fertility Research and Practice
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one scored the same or higher as 13 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.