You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Density of surface charge is a more predictive factor of the toxicity of cationic carbon nanoparticles than zeta potential
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-020-00747-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maud Weiss, Jiahui Fan, Mickaël Claudel, Thomas Sonntag, Pascal Didier, Carole Ronzani, Luc Lebeau, Françoise Pons |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 16% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 36 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 12 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 10% |
| Engineering | 8 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 21% |
| Unknown | 39 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2021.
All research outputs
#18,807,229
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#944
of 1,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#376,019
of 503,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.