↓ Skip to main content

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with headless compression screws

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with headless compression screws
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13018-016-0425-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ji-Cheng Gong, Bing-Hua Zhou, Xu Tao, Cheng-Song Yuan, Kang-Lai Tang

Abstract

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with headless compression screws has not been previously reported. We hypothesized that these screws could be suitable for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis because of their special design. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with headless compression screws for the treatment of severe arthropathy of the ankle and subtalar joint. From 2010 to 2015, 23 patients with severe ankle and subtalar arthropathy underwent tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. All surgeries were completed by a senior surgeon in the same hospital. These patients were 18~76 years (mean 54.6 years) old; the duration of their disease was 9~38 months (mean 13.2 months). The study population included 12 males and 11 females; 12 patients underwent surgery on the left and 11 on the right. Indications for surgery included avascular necrosis of the talus (n = 14), severe posttraumatic arthritis (n = 4), osteoarthritis (n = 2), terminal tuberculous arthritis (n = 1), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 1) and Charcot neuroarthropathy (n = 1). A lateral oblique incision was performed to expose the subtalar joint, and an anteromedial longitudinal incision was used to expose the ankle joint. After the articular surfaces were removed, the tibia, talus and calcaneus were carefully aligned and fixed with two headless compression screws. Patients were followed up at 6 weeks and 3, 6 and 9 months after surgery; they were evaluated by Roles and Maudsley patient satisfaction scores, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score and radiographic evaluation. Seventeen patients were studied, with a mean follow-up time of 6.5 months (range 5-24). The mean Roles and Maudsley patient satisfaction score was 1.41 at the last follow-up; most of the patients were satisfied with the surgery results. The mean preoperative AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score was 29.6 (range 18-37), while the mean last follow-up AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score was 68.5 (range 61-80). The VAS score for preoperative functional pain was 6.95 (range 3-10) compared to 1.56 (range 0-3) postoperatively (P < 0.001). The mean surgical duration was 57 (range 42-125) min. The mean time to union was 3.8 months (range 3-12 months); fusion of the ankle and subtalar joint was successful in all patients. One patient experienced delayed wound healing. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with headless compression screws for the treatment of severe arthropathy of the ankle and subtalar joint is an effective treatment that is minimally invasive and is associated with a short operation time, high fusion rate, low incidence of complications and good postoperative recovery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Other 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 20 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 34%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 28 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,416
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#647
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,141
of 343,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#25
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.