You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proceedings of the 15th Annual UT-KBRIN Bioinformatics Summit 2016
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12859-016-1154-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric C. Rouchka, Julia H. Chariker, Benjamin J. Harrison, Juw Won Park, Xueyuan Cao, Stanley Pounds, Susana Raimondi, James Downing, Raul Ribeiro, Jeffery Rubnitz, Jatinder Lamba, Bernie J. Daigle, Deborah Burgess, Stephanie Gehrlich, John C. Carmen, Nicholas Johnson, Chandrakanth Emani, Stephanie Gehrlich, Deborah Burgess, John C. Carmen, Kalpani De Silva, Michael P. Heaton, Theodore S. Kalbfleisch, Teeradache Viangteeravat, Rahul Mudunuri, Oluwaseun Ajayi, Fatih Şen, Eunice Y. Huang, Mohammad Mohebbi, Luaire Florian, Douglas J. Jackson, John F. Naber, AKM Sabbir, Sally R. Ellingson, Yuping Lu, Charles A Phillips, Michael A. Langston, Rahul K. Sevakula, Raghuveer Thirukovalluru, Nishchal K. Verma, Yan Cui, Mohammed Sayed, Juw Won Park, Jing Wang, Qi Liu, Yu Shyr, Xiaofei Zhang, Sally R. Ellingson, Naresh Prodduturi, Gavin R. Oliver, Diane Grill, Jie Na, Jeanette Eckel-Passow, Eric W. Klee, Michael M. Goodin, Mark Farman, Harrison Inocencio, Chanyong Jang, Jerzy W. Jaromczyk, Neil Moore, Kelly Sovacool, Leon Dent, Mike Izban, Sammed Mandape, Shruti Sakhare, Siddharth Pratap, Dana Marshall, M Scotty DePriest, James N. MacLeod, Theodore S. Kalbfleisch, Chandrakanth Emani, Hanady Adam, Ethan Blandford, Joel Campbell, Joshua Castlen, Brittany Dixon, Ginger Gilbert, Aaron Hall, Philip Kreisle, Jessica Lasher, Bethany Oakes, Allison Speer, Maximilian Valentine, Naga Satya V. Rao Nagisetty, Rony Jose, Teeradache Viangteeravat, Robert Rooney, David Hains |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 29% |
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 5 | 29% |
| Engineering | 4 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,337,788
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,871
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,792
of 343,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#109
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.