↓ Skip to main content

Limitations of using surrogates for behaviour classification of accelerometer data: refining methods using random forest models in Caprids

Overview of attention for article published in Movement Ecology, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Limitations of using surrogates for behaviour classification of accelerometer data: refining methods using random forest models in Caprids
Published in
Movement Ecology, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40462-021-00265-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eleanor R. Dickinson, Joshua P. Twining, Rory Wilson, Philip A. Stephens, Jennie Westander, Nikki Marks, David M. Scantlebury

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 13 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 34%
Environmental Science 5 13%
Computer Science 2 5%
Unspecified 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,569,073
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Movement Ecology
#158
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,590
of 447,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Movement Ecology
#13
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.