You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12909-021-02644-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daniel Zhihao Hong, Jia Ling Goh, Zhi Yang Ong, Jacquelin Jia Qi Ting, Mun Kit Wong, Jiaxuan Wu, Xiu Hui Tan, Rachelle Qi En Toh, Christine Li Ling Chiang, Caleb Wei Hao Ng, Jared Chuan Kai Ng, Yun Ting Ong, Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong, Kuang Teck Tay, Laura Hui Shuen Tan, Gillian Li Gek Phua, Warren Fong, Limin Wijaya, Shirlyn Hui Shan Neo, Alexia Sze Inn Lee, Min Chiam, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
Other | 20 | 22% |
Unknown | 41 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 17% |
Unknown | 46 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,039,151
of 25,455,127 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#490
of 3,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,239
of 458,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#8
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,455,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,998 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.