↓ Skip to main content

A guide for evaluation of online learning in medical education: a qualitative reflective analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A guide for evaluation of online learning in medical education: a qualitative reflective analysis
Published in
BMC Medical Education, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12909-021-02752-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nourhan F. Wasfy, Enjy Abouzeid, Asmaa Abdel Nasser, Samar A. Ahmed, Ilham Youssry, Nagwa N. Hegazy, Mohamed Hany K. Shehata, Doaa Kamal, Hani Atwa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 16 13%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 4%
Researcher 5 4%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 68 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 72 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,777,864
of 25,350,078 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#676
of 3,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,977
of 440,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#16
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,350,078 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.