You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of renal histopathology and gene expression profiles between severe COVID-19 and bacterial sepsis in critically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03631-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Meint Volbeda, Daniela Jou-Valencia, Marius C. van den Heuvel, Marjolein Knoester, Peter J. Zwiers, Janesh Pillay, Stefan P. Berger, Peter H. J. van der Voort, Jan G. Zijlstra, Matijs van Meurs, Jill Moser |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 4 | 17% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 74% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,964,241
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,479
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,254
of 458,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#55
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.