You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Esophageal granular cell tumor and eosinophils: a multicenter experience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diagnostic Pathology, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13000-021-01113-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deepti Reddi, Christropher Chandler, Diana Cardona, Michael Schild, Maria Westerhoff, Emily McMullen, Yutaka Tomizawa, Lani Clinton, Paul E. Swanson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,895,945
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#130
of 1,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,862
of 447,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.