↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Eye‑color and Type‑2 diabetes phenotype prediction from genotype data using deep learning methods

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Eye‑color and Type‑2 diabetes phenotype prediction from genotype data using deep learning methods
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12859-021-04218-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Muneeb, Andreas Henschel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2021.
All research outputs
#14,267,331
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#4,571
of 7,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,285
of 446,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#131
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.